The Story of George Stinney Jr.

     George Stinney Jr. was a 14-year-old Black boy from Alcolu, South Carolina, whose wrongful conviction and execution remain one of the most tragic injustices in American history. Born on October 21, 1929 Stinney grew up in a small, segregated mill town where racial tensions were deeply ingrained in daily life. His childhood was abruptly stolen from him when he was accused, convicted, and executed in 1944 (less than 100 years ago!) for the alleged murders of two young white girls, Betty June Binnicker, age 11, and Mary Emma Thames, age 7. His case was a clear example of the failures of the legal system, with racial prejudice leading to his swift and unjust execution.

     On March 23, 1944 Betty June and Mary Emma went missing while riding their bicycles through the town. Their bodies were discovered the following day in a water-filled ditch, having suffered fatal blunt force trauma to the head. Authorities immediately turned their focus to George Stinney after learning that he and his younger sister, Aime, had briefly spoken to the girls earlier that day. Stinney was taken from his home and interrogated alone for hours, without a lawyer, his parents, or any adult advocate present. Soon after, police claimed he had confessed, though no signed or recorded confession was ever produced.

     Just a month later, Stinney was put on trial in what can only be described as a sham proceeding. His court appointed lawyer, who had no experience handling capital cases, failed to mount any real defense. No witnesses were called on Stinney’s behalf, and no physical evidence linked him to the crime. The all white jury took only ten minutes to deliberate before finding him guilty. In the racially motivated South, his fate was sealed before he ever set foot in the courtroom.

     On June 16, 1944 just 83 days after the girls’ deaths, Stinney was executed in the electric chair at the South Carolina State Penitentiary. At just 5 feet 1 inch tall and weighing 95 pounds, the oversized chair was not designed for someone so small. Witnesses described the horrifying scene as the large electrodes slipped from his head during the execution, causing his body to convulse violently. It only took two 2,450 volts to kill him instantly, and George was so small that they used a Bible to lift him in the seat high enough to reach the large electrodes above. The inhumane nature of his death, combined with the gross miscarriage of justice, left a deep scar on those who later came to understand the gravity of what had happened.

     The state of South Carolina had absolutely no evidence that George committed this crime. George being the 95-pound, 14-year-old that he was, he was physically incapable of committing such violent crimes. The injuries that the girls sustained were done with much more force than George’s weight. The only thing that made him guilty was the fact that he was a Black boy who happened to take the same route as the two White girls, Betty and Mary. While the state was so busy putting an innocent Black boy to death, the true and very possibly White suspect was out there living a free life probably ready to strike and kill again. After all, the only fibers and hairs that were found on the two girls were consistent with a White man. This was not made public knowledge at the time, but would have been useless anyway seeing as their minds were already made up about who did this.

     The execution of George Stinney Jr. became a powerful symbol of racial injustice, particularly in the South, where Black individuals were often subjected to rushed trials and severe punishments without proper legal representation. For decades, his case was a haunting reminder of how the legal system had failed him. In 2014, after persistent efforts by civil rights activists, historians, and legal scholars, a South Carolina judge overturned Stinney’s conviction, ruling that his trial had been a “great and fundamental injustice.” The judge acknowledged that Stinney had been denied his constitutional rights, rendering his conviction legally void.

    Though this ruling came more than 70 years too late to save him, it provided an important acknowledgment of the grave injustice committed against him. His case has since influenced discussions on juvenile justice, the death penalty, and racial bias in the legal system. His story continues to serve as a reminder of the importance of due process and equal protection under the law. While his life was taken unfairly, his legacy remains a driving force in the fight for justice and legal reform.

Support the author:

Tips are not necessary but greatly appreciated and help keep this blog going weekly. Thank you in advance and take care!

Zelle: Thyre127@gmail.com

Cashapp: $Thyre127